‹ Back

Thought-loops can be identified as a holistic reference with signatures including: Emotional-affective, pre-symbolic or symbolic concepts, memory associations, and lower-order thought-mechanisms. These are good components to a top-reference as long as they are fully integrated and can maintain coherence when engaging in tangible active focus. It is possible to delineate loop components and modify the structure utilizing a temporal foundation.

 

It is important to engage with a loop fully to understand its structure, but knowing your cognitive architecture and having a high degree of fluency will allow you to infer this structure when built. Procedures can then be accessed directly and cognition becomes surfing while building the wave. Thoughts will become precursors to new recursive mechanisms.

These mechanisms used in tandem with reference delineation will provide diagnostic capabilities, that when utilized as a procedural loop, automates the building of thought-structures. Tangible focus is now used as a top-level interface between recursive loops and generative processing. With a focus on both, we can begin to define generative loops that create active formatting of thought-processes. By combining generative loops into our original thought-mechanism, we can see a distinct process emerge.

By combining all signals and information into a combined unit we can directly manage our responses to stimuli and situations. By engaging with this on a meta-level, we can directly manage the way we carry-out situations. By having direct access to a loop itself, we have the ability to generate a whole new loop entirely dependent on simulated criteria. Applying a cue to the start of a loop for it to activate (such as a specific location or person you may encounter) allows you to verify the integrity of the loop and re-orient context to the whole procedure. This is important to disallow any potential interference from pre-existing context that may vary dependent on top-cycle variables.

 

With an intuitive representation of what a loop looks like, we can modify its structure and thus guide our responses to potential conditions. By doing so, we can also identify loops on scale. They can vary in size and structure, but the foundational components remain the same. Loops may look different in different people, but timing and structure are constants that are identifiable, but can be masked or intentionally 'misguided'.